Mention Containing Books The State and Revolution
| Title | : | The State and Revolution |
| Author | : | Vladimir Lenin |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | First Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 116 pages |
| Published | : | June 1st 2004 by Kessinger Publishing (first published 1917) |
| Categories | : | Politics. Nonfiction. Philosophy. History |
Vladimir Lenin
Paperback | Pages: 116 pages Rating: 4.08 | 5455 Users | 311 Reviews
Interpretation As Books The State and Revolution
If you happen to get the version which has a forward by Richard Pipes, I strongly suggest reading the text of Vladimir Lenin first, maybe Google or Wikipedia some of the historical references, and draw your own conclusion. Richard Pipes is your classical establishment propaganda clerk who's job is to 'help' you see the text the way the State wants you to, that is, defanged of its revolutionary message. Pipes slides in his prejudice hidden by historical facts, intent on having you view this remarkable man dismissively as a rebel. Lenin clearly shows that in order to bring about change we need a violent revolution of the working people (proletariat) against the slave owners (bourgeois) Lenin, who draws from Karl Marx and Fredric Engels shows the 'State' for what it is. A parasitic institution created by an oppressing class against its enemy -- the 99% -- You and I, the working class. He explains why it is inevitable that this class conflict will lead to revolution. And looking at current events as well as historical ones, the facts are undeniable. He also shows the many ways the State tries to disable this prophetic voice, not unlike the forward by richard pipes talked about previously. Karl Marx was every bit an objective scientist, but truth is not wanted by those who lie! Viva la revolution!Specify Books To The State and Revolution
| Original Title: | Государство и революция |
| ISBN: | 1419183478 (ISBN13: 9781419183478) |
| Edition Language: | English |
| Setting: | Russian Empire,1917 Russia |
Rating Containing Books The State and Revolution
Ratings: 4.08 From 5455 Users | 311 ReviewsNotice Containing Books The State and Revolution
It was a more polemical explanation of Engels and Marx's ideas of what will happen to the state as history moves forward through its changes and revolutions. Lenin is someone that takes to task many other thinkers of his day in order to show them that he is the one with the correct interpretation which makes the dense ideas quite digestible.it was however, very interesting to read about the concept of the state that goes beyond the usual capitalist versus socialist versus anarchist debate.IState and Revolution Lenin Review:The most dangerous lies start with fragments of truth and become full-fledged deceptions.The first thing that striked and shocked me was the initial anti state stance on a correct notion of it as an evil and a monopoly of coercion that today it is found in libertarianism. But here is where the truth stops !!What comes next is a text that resembles the interpretation and explanation of the christian teachings with examples and quotations from The Bible, against
The opening of this book is perhaps the most enlightening thing Ive ever read on Marxism (I guess technically its Marxist-Leninism since here we are reading Lenin). The initial reflection on what the function and the history of the State is in relation to Bourgeois democracy and premodern slave societies is brilliant.I remember reading the Communist Manifesto and being so confused. Everyone had said that Communism was violent, but I had been willing to defend it tooth and nail as peaceful. That
Lenin's books are not worth reading. Calling upon people to destroy the state is easy enough; building up something after that, not so easy. Claiming that people will magically fall in love with laboring for others doesn't actually solve the problem, even if Marx (the great prophet) declared it so. Also, I can't help but mock the "scientific" nature of Lenin's plans. As we all know, Russia was indeed ripe for communism. If only we could all live in a world as good as the Soviet Union! Oh,
Shockingly lucid and surprisingly accessible. In an extremely short book of very limited scope (to examine the nature of the state before, during, and after the revolution), Lenin accomplishes what much more ambitious works can only dream of: he lays out a credible, concrete roadmap for the development of a society on its way to full communism.Lenin argues like a disingenuous dipshit (indeed, a scoundrelif he hadn't gone on to put his ideas into practice so successfully I'd have a much lower
This is a critique of socialists, anarchists, and "vulgarized" or "opportunistic" Marxism. Basically anyone who isn't itching for a bloody revolution is a fool or an imposter as far as Lenin is concerned. History has not been kind to his theories and assumptions. It would appear the vision of the Soviets was incomplete, and where the purpose and knowledge of the workers fell short, party communism stepped in and filled the void with totalitarianism.
The February Revolution of 1917 goaded the fall of the Romanov dynasty when tsar Nicholas II abdicated, and things started to look surprisingly auspicious for Vladimir Ilich Lenin and his Bolshevik party. However, the Provisional Government of Georgi Lvov, in the midst of the colossal military turmoil of World War I, wasn't particularly sympathetic of Lenin's anti-war stance. After his arrival in Petrograd (to be renamed after him Leningrad), Lenin was falsely accused of being a German agent and
0 Comments